09 Sep
Mouthing Off: Uch, It’s Uchitel

The 10th year anniversary of the attacks on our country is coming up and as many people are remembering and reflecting, mourning and thinking about the future, others are stunning us with their stupidity.

Like Rachel Uchitel, for example.  You may know her as one of Tiger Woods’ mistresses (the skanky one with the big breasts…oh, wait) but the sad fact is that before any of that happened, her fiance, James Andrew O’Grady, was murdered on September 11th. (Here’s her then:)

Grief takes many different forms, so perhaps we should cut Rachel some slack for  saying,
“I believe Andy was meant to die because he was too good…I’m almost happy it ended the way it did because I’ve learned so many lessons from him. It would have been tragic if we got into fights and then divorced.”

Yes, well, the tragedy of fighting and divorce has certainly been avoided. Now let’s talk about the tragedy of someone so f–in narcissistic that she actually thinks a poor soul’s death was to her benefit. How the person interviewing her didn’t just slap her across the face is a marvel.  We know we would have been very stabby if we’d been there. (Here she is after 9/11:)

(Nice, huh? We see she’s done a lot of, um, changing while she grieves.)

Uchitel also envisioned the tragic fate for herself had she and Andy married:  “I would be a fat housewife with three kids in Sands Point, LI.” Thank God that didn’t happen, right? Because a fat Rachel raising Andy’s children would have been WAY worse than Andy’s parents losing their son. And then she and Gloria Allred wouldn’t have become rich by blackmailing Tiger Woods. See, it all worked out for the best! Whooo hoooo!

Rachel now says that she and her new lucky fiance are contemplating having children.   And all we have to say about that is we certainly hope she reflects on the meaning of life before they go ahead.

Because if she doesn’t, all that’s going to be is another horrible tragedy.

Update: Uchitel is now claiming that her comments were taken out of context and she is reportedly lawyering up to sue! We assume that the “out of context” refers to her being asked, “Please tell us, what are some thoughts about your fiance’s death that have never crossed your mind.” If that is indeed what happened, Rachel, please accept our apologies. If it isn’t, we have some other ideas for what you can do.

 

17 Responses to “Mouthing Off: Uch, It’s Uchitel”

09.09.11#1

Comment by DG at Diaryofamadbathroom.

That’s a class act right there. Good thing our national tragedy spared her that unsightly cellulite. What a useless hobag.

HogsAteMySister Reply:

Not useless. Excellent blog fodder and silicone holder.

09.09.11#2

Comment by Muffintopmommy.

Speechless. I hope his parents don’t see her interview. Just disgusting.

09.09.11#3

Comment by Becky.

Why couldn’t she be a Darwin Award winner?

09.09.11#4

Comment by Peajaye.

How could you make fun of a woman who’s so exhausted from depression that she can’t even put on a bra, button her shirt, or stand up without the support of a wall?

Aubrey Anne Reply:

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=1010&sid=17135692 My dad shared this article with me as a comment on my blog. I wanted to pass it along. People really, truly don’t understand. 🙁

Plano Mom Reply:

I appreciate what you’re trying to say, Aubrey Anne, but assuming this woman is mentally ill is also making an assumption based on little fact, and is an injustice to countless people who are truly diagnosed as mentally ill, as opposed to just plain unthinkingly foolish. That distinction is neither mine nor yours to make.

Aubrey Anne Reply:

The only reason I said what I said was because of the comment I was replying to, specifically. It said: “How could you make fun of a woman who’s so exhausted from depression that she can’t even put on a bra, button her shirt, or stand up without the support of a wall?” The comment I made was ONLY about that comment, not about the article itself.

Plano Mom Reply:

Got it, sorry.

Bean Reply:

Aubrey Anne, I’m pretty sure Peajaye was being sarcastic. She was referring to the second picture, not the one of Rachel holding the picture of her fiancee.

Aubrey Anne Reply:

Hahaha, seriously changes this whole thing, doesn’t it? Maybe I ought to drink my coffee before commenting next time. 😉

09.09.11#5

Comment by Wendi.

The real problem isn’t that she thinks this stuff, it’s that she’s so fucking stupid & insensitive that she’ll SAY IT TO A NEWSPAPER REPORTER.

Plano Mom Reply:

Amen. Don’t say it if it requires an explanation to be acceptable.

09.09.11#6

Comment by Plano Mom.

More proof that we have a dearth of tact as pervasive as the dearth of rain in Texas.

09.09.11#7

Comment by Marie.

She reminds me of Danielle Staub.

09.09.11#8

Comment by Annie.

Ladies, I love you..but I have to disagree with you on this one. There’s no doubt that she suffered greatly when her fiancé was killed. I don’t think any of you would question if her grief was real? She’s obviously been a lost soul since his death and has been dealing with addiction. When I see her..I see someone in a lot of pain. Who knows what state she was in when she made these comments. It sounds to me like she was trying to convince herself that his death wasn’t such a bad thing when she knows in her heart that it broke her in half. Sometimes you need to remember the compassion. And like my mom always says, “the people who are the hardest to love are the ones who need it the most!”

09.11.11#9

Comment by HogsAteMySister.

Until now,Joe Biden and Prince Philip were my heroes. They have been totally biffed aside by Rachel and her bolt-ons. Tiger? Is he a class magnet or what?

Consider Checking Out...